The following comparison shows the result of two published design methods for propellers. Both methods are very similar and differ only slightly. The results show no large differences. I believe, that the results of the JavaProp code (which you can use it on this web), are reliable enough to be used for "real world" designs.
Two of my computer codes, namely the first one (SIMple PROPeller) based on Adkins and PROPPY (based on Larrabee) have been run. For the comparison, the same design parameters and airfoil characteristics have been fed into both methods. The resulting geometry is depicted below.
Comparison of the chord length distributions of the test propellers.
Comparison of the twist distributions of the test propellers.
Last modification of this page: 21.05.18
[Back to Home Page] Suggestions? Corrections? Remarks? e-mail: Martin Hepperle.
Due to the increasing amount of SPAM mail, I have to change this e-Mail address regularly. You will always find the latest version in the footer of all my pages.
It might take some time until you receive an answer
and in some cases you may even receive no answer at all. I apologize for this, but
my spare time is limited. If you have not lost patience, you might want to send
me a copy of your e-mail after a month or so.
This is a privately owned, non-profit page of purely educational purpose. Any statements may be incorrect and unsuitable for practical usage. I cannot take any responsibility for actions you perform based on data, assumptions, calculations etc. taken from this web page.
© 1996-2018 Martin Hepperle
You may use the data given in this document for your personal use. If you use this document for a publication, you have to cite the source. A publication of a recompilation of the given material is not allowed, if the resulting product is sold for more than the production costs.
This document may accidentally refer to trade names and trademarks, which are owned by national or international companies, but which are unknown by me. Their rights are fully recognized and these companies are kindly asked to inform me if they do not wish their names to be used at all or to be used in a different way.
This document is part of a frame set and can be found by navigating from the entry point at the Web site http://www.MH-AeroTools.de/.